open science

Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring ToolKit (nilmtk)

Nipun, Oli and I have just started work on an open source toolkit for non-intrusive load monitoring called nilmtk. We're pretty excited about it! It's only in the very, very earliest stages (the code repository currently has precisely zero lines of code in it!) although we've started to flesh out the design on the project's wiki.

Why don't academics discuss research before starting the work?!

Warning: this is a hopelessly idealistic proposal...

As far as I can tell, scientists of all types tend to be secretive about their work prior to publication. I guess the fear is that, without secrecy, another lab might steal the idea and publish it first. But this secrecy comes with several significant costs, one of which is the huge length of time between first having an idea and then getting feedback from peers. First you have your bright idea, then you do the necessary research (which might take years), then you write up a paper, then you submit the paper to a journal or conference and a while later you get your first bit of peer feedback.

This feels extraordinarily inefficient. If an idea is bad then it needs to fail fast (before resources have been expended). And if an idea needs improving then it's far better to improve the proposal before doing all the work rather than trying to retrofit a fix after the bulk of the work has been done.

How about this as an alternative:

Subscribe to RSS - open science